What was the difference between John Ruddy's foul on Ramires and the foul on Suarez against Sunderland? Ruddy sent off, Richardson didn't
They play 85 minutes with 10 men and we win easily - 9 points out of 9, happy days!
|
|
What was the difference between John Ruddy's foul on Ramires and the foul on Suarez against Sunderland? Ruddy sent off, Richardson didn't
They play 85 minutes with 10 men and we win easily - 9 points out of 9, happy days!
Phil Dowd.
And what about the 3 penalties against bolton, we could be top of the league on goal difference aswell,.
Bruce always nicks a couple of points off us.Fate.
Hope we do 'em 7-0 in the return.
Should have scored more and not let them back into it until we had.
Should have got the Pen but if you don't you carry on playing until you get goals
On any other day that Sunderland player would of got sent off
im still annoyed at that . you know what a man icty fan said to me he goes i swear liverpool where unbeatable the end of last season and now your doing just ok . i said wtf 7 points out of 9 ok! we got robbed of our other 2 **** you then i kicked him from the party (on xbox btw)
Different ref and linesmen, and probably different angle of view which could have made the tackle more/less ferocious. The game isn't controlled by some sort of supercomputer you know, it's controlled by people who need to make quick decisions over anything that infringes a rule.
I'm surprised no one has said..... If Suarez had of scored the pen then we would have won!
I know, it's to bad. But stuff like this happens.
This is a cop out. The officials get paid a pretty decent salary to make this decisions, and in the Suarez case, it had nothing to do with how 'ferocious' the tackle was, but that it clearly stopped a goal scoring opportunity. If the Ruddy incident was a red, so should all similar incidents....and it wasn't as if it was a split second thing that happened off the ball, it was pretty clear.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |