|
|
Why Janno why?
Title says it all........ why?
Don't give me the "this is a family forum" nonsense...... that was my family and there was NOTHING even vaguely offensive on that site.
You take your kids to the local swimming pools/beach and they'll see more naked flesh.
Or was it the smothered hamsters that bothered you?........ they where FAKE dude............. don't panic.... we love animals
You seriously have to ask?
Yes.... as I said a trip to the beach or swimming baths would see the same thing........ MTV will show you a **** lot worse........ in that context i don't see what was wrong with the thread in general or the link I provided.Originally Posted by Jannno
My other half is home now and she's laughing her pretty little ass off, that someone is offended by seeing her in a bikini top + mini-skirt......... most weekends she gets payed to dress like that and you all got a freebie
Anyone offended by a female in a bikini top and mini-skirt should avoid going outside in summer and definatly avoid TV + the Internet.
Last edited by Mettatron; 13-4-12 at 11:16. Reason: spelling, punctuation.... take your pick
Then have another look at the images. A scantily clad female with her legs apart, viewed from below hanging around a pole isn't the kind of thing we have on these forums. Don't come with the 'you see it on a beach' argument. Its all about context as you know of course, and putting up your wife's website of 'glamour girls for hire' isn't for a family forum. Your personal values might not necessarily reflect this place.
Apart from that little respect was being shown for Claire Rourke in that thread the more it went on - she's a professional journalist who works for the club you support. She's not putting herself up for public dissection of her personal physical attributes. You and others obviously had a problem spotting the difference.
I was perfectly polite about Claire.... I simply said "she wasnt my type"
I then got called gay....... in jest I suspect..... so I took no offence....... could have but didnt....
I could take offence to you describing my other half as a "glamour girl for hire"........ we both know that means "porn" in most circles....... I pointed out in that thread it wasnt anything of the sort....... clubs + pubs have themes....... "coyote ugly" for example....... we provide "dancers" to suit said theme........ we DO NOT provide topless or naked "dancers" or anything that could be extrapolated from that!
Anyway your a mod , so you win by default.
/peace
Just for the record. I didnt call you gay as an insult, i was alluding to not agreeing when someone is pretty when they are then you may have a different preference. In jest.
Also, my hamster joke was in good taste.
You're not blamed entirely for the thread it was on its way down before you posted your link. No insult of you or your wife intended, but there's no way that kind of content was suitable for here.
I wasnt bothered by it dude....... took it as intended..... abit of harmless banter
I've deleted the topic. Please show some respect for colleagues who work extremely hard and don't deserve to be the subject of snide comments.
As for the link. I haven't seen it but we're trying to create a space where LFC fans can feel comfortable posting. That means that what may be suitable for some won't be for others. The good news is that the internet is a big place and there are sites where anything goes. This isn't one of those sites.
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
