
Originally Posted by
RedEmmaG
And their own taxes don't forget, EVERYONE pays taxes, try not paying that VAT next time you buy something. But the morality of that act has no bearing on the other act, cos one is wrong there is no causal link to the other being wrong or vice versa.
So, we can clearly see those who subscribe to a two wrongs make a right system of morality. Justifying one immoral act by referring to a "but he did something wrong first sir" defence.
And then we have the "if 600 people in Westminster have said it is wrong, it's wrong" kind of morality. It's the LAW don't you know.
The morality of screwing the social aside ( cos it has no moral bearing on grassing), grassing is in most cases, imo wrong, anti-social and disempowering. But then I never was a fan of Judas myself and could see clearly the moral lesson of that story.