Good lad is Craig though he's been very quiet recently.
Is the whole 100 just going to be the payers?
Those who made the list all got three or more nominations.
For the few on equal votes I then used a formula based on the number of years they've been active and the average posts per day to separate them. Though this was only used to separate a few posters in each grouping. For example posters between positions 75 to 81 might have had the same votes so would have to be separated this way then perhaps only numbers 52 and 53 were on equal votes and so on.
Note: I'm just using the above positions as examples, they don't necessarily have equal votes.
The most amount of posters on equal votes was 7 and these were in the lower half of the list (50 -100) the higher up the list, the less there were on equal votes.
Only two posters in the top 10 were on equal votes, these were not the top 4.
Craig should have been way higher up. Though I can't complain since I couldn't be bothered to participate.
Craig only 99? Tougher list than i thought obviously. He was one of my votes too. If we're going on the basis of "shook the forums" (i.e. being a bit of a polemicist) he should be top 20 easily.
If those two are last, not many stand a chance
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|