Of course the money may be more now as fans are paying more to sky and bt this year due to the price rises again. Its getting so expensive now to have both sky and bt. You are a lucky guy getting it for free.
Last edited by GrottonRed; 21-4-17 at 15:36. Reason: you were warned
Maybe it was a dig at Edwards. Can't remember where I read it but there was a story that he has some sort of software that calculates the value of a player and what he should be earning based on his career stats/experience and this is used in negotiations. This was why the contract was £4k a week. Could be a load of cobblers too of course.
Entirely predictably the club has nothing to say - we don't want our business done in public.
Its only the daily mail too, when all said and done, saying that, I would not be surprised if our owners refused to pay the going rate, I bet it would not be the first time.
Would the £15m derby wanted for will hughes have been justified? Many cursed fsg and rodgers for not paying up for him!
What would spurs fans say about not paying the 'going rate' for mane, suarez and lallana who they could have bought.
Last edited by GrottonRed; 21-4-17 at 15:40. Reason: more of it
Last edited by GrottonRed; 21-4-17 at 15:42. Reason: have a day off
Had he come here there's no telling how he'd have developed under Rodgers, could've been another Markovic, who knows?
It's a fine line to tread. If you want to sign the best young talent then how far do you push the boat out? On the one hand it's a sensible policy to not hand out bumper deals to kids, but when you miss out on a real talent over a few grand then it stings.
It's there, black and white, clear as crystal.
'By purchasing this ticket you accept that The Owners shall not be held responsible for slip ups, poor performances, goalkeeping errors, slipshod defending and injuries etc etc etc'
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|