One poster banned...and more will follow if the constant personal sniping continues.
This thread is to discuss FSG...not an excuse to have a pop at perceived groups of supporters or any supporter for that matter.
I ask this in every FSG thread, apart from the benevolent billionaires, which three PL owners would you prefer to have?
Can we get this back on topic now...
Could the club have spent more on players? Sure. I've been guilty of saying that about them too in the past. But I can also totally understand that if I were the owner, I would be a little hesitant to sanction more big spending after some of the big-money flops that we've brought in since arriving. We all know the names & the price tags.
I won't give the owners full credit for everything good around the club, but I certainly won't blame them for all the wrongs either. It's not fair to dismiss all of the positive things they've done because I may be unhappy about one thing or another. I just feel that we're in better hands than we've been in, in quite a long time and things are certainly looking up for the entire club and the supporters.
His statement: The quality of the player leads to slips, bad goalkeeping, and bad defending. Obvious corollary: Stevie slipped because he wasn't up to the quality required to not slip therefor not a quality player. Elementary level logic interpretation of his statement...they can control the quality of the players on the pitch which leads to slips bad goalkeeping and bad defending
Perfect fit or not, we needed more depth at the start of the season and in January when we had injuries and Mane leaving for CAF. I'm not an apologist for the owners and I love Klopp, but I think he can be stubborn at times and refused to spend money 'unnecessarily' which he had available during both windows this year.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|