No problem. The system I'm thinking of would be radically different from the system we have now (of course it is).
Firstly there would be a cultural change. I know Ron is ex military so I quite liked the Marine Code. I think it is nice to have a code of ethics. So anybody joining, participating in a political party, running for position whatever must pledge allegiance to the Coach Political Code.
The code is Humanity. Environment. National Population. Political Integrity. Party. Self.
The next step will be that there is an abolition of party leaders. Nobody is a leader and all parties must formulate general policy with strict adherence unless another democratic party vote allows change. Each party can post in writing their policies and ideologies to be read on free to air TV stations, public libraries, on line and in print.
Media is only allowed to discuss policy. Local MP's cannot appear on TV, nor can they talk on radio and the only means of party communication other than through non verbal disclosure of policy is face to face engagement with people in their local areas. Weekly meetings, question and answer sessions and face to face explanations of policy are allowed. This will force interaction and prevent mass manipulation through sophisticated methods.
The nation is divided into equality areas and equality sub areas. This is a system of dividing the nation into sections or sub sections geographically.
You vote for a party, not a person. This exactly encourage those craving power and celebrity to fight to the top. The party with the most votes wins.
Each party must declare a representative for their respective sub areas, or an independent can stand. When an election victory is achieved that party decides national budgets for all government activities on a national level only.
Then the budget is distributed using a system that cannot be changed or altered called the equality system. Of the sections of the country, the sections with the most wealth receive the least funding automatically. In the sub sections the poorest areas of those sections receive the most funding until there is equality.
Each section is run by the party in power. However it is a working coalition of all those that ran for office and achieved enough votes to serve. At this point until another election is called all members of each party must form a local government and work for the party in power as they declared in their oath to put national population interests first. Learn how and why they want to do what they do, become familiar with co-operation above confrontation and they can happily report backs faults or benefits the current ruling party put in place.
There is also a second caveat which is the taxation system. This is also equality based. Those in the highest sub section for wealth, in the wealthiest sections pay the most tax. The poorest areas in the poorest sections pay the least. This is absolutely the same for population as it is corporation.
Local districts can only 'hire' or 'train' local people or local businesses to run and build the systems needed. That means if a poor area of the country receives the majority of funding for transport as it has the worst transport system then a corporation wishing to utilise that and bid for contract would have to be prepared to build a sustainable system in that poorer area. However the huge benefit would be they pay lower tax in income for the new company they set up there.
Corporations can only own 50% of the company set up in any area the other 50% must be owned by the district itself. Low taxes, lower taxes for employees creates a mutually beneficial system for business moving and more evenly distributing amongst the population.
The long term goal is to equalise wealth and have each local district completely self sufficient for food, energy, shelter, education and transport. All party members will have basic pay but will be paid on performance. If party X wins and they equalise wealth and improve living standards for the majority they all receive bonuses along with the candidates for other parties who were assimilated for the term of office.
If one party succeeds even opposition party members assimilated benefit.
The final system is that capital interest is illegal. Banks cannot charge interest. If they collapse because of this then the nation will acquire them and provide money to the national government interest free. If required a basic minimum wage will be given to the population until living standards rise sufficiently.
All political meetings are public in every party, every meeting. Total transparency notorised. The economy will focus on science, technology innovation, self sufficiency, problem solving as will education. There will be no testing in schools.
Education will be a place to love learning. There will be core principles of compassion, honesty, co-operation, problem solving, mental and physical health as well as logic taught in schools as the main focus supplemented with mastery of science, language and mathematics. These skills are transferable to any chosen path in future.
Each citizen will be entitled equal DDM (Democratic Decision Maker). As you equalise in monetary terms people will receive titles for service to communities. There will either be land redistribution or population redistribution to fully utilise the land.
Television must contain 50% educational TV. 50% of TV must be made locally. For Radio 50% of music must be produced by national acts. Every industry has the same distribution factors. If London is the home of recording artists they face the same high taxes. If the population cannot afford the expensive music produced in London then music producers and distributors will have to relocate or offer localised talent opportunities.
You can go on and on but I like this system. I'm happy to let you tear it apart.
It is a political system based around co-operation. Firstly there are systems for distribution replacing humans with self interest. There is a smaller government. There is larger investment available for private sector just on a localised basis.
All party members must pledge to serve humanity, environment, population before self. They must also co-operate with each other. It would lead to smaller government. Less confrontation and any company tendering for local services must also make the same pledge but put corporation in instead of self. They would be 50% owned by the district and completely reliant upon that district for labour so business and nation working together.
I highlighted how society would be structured just to pre answer as many questions as possible. If you want a simple electoral system you have to block the ways wealth, corporations and power can exploit that electoral system.